-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 144
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump preseq #390
Bump preseq #390
Conversation
|
@nf-core-bot fix linting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
CHANGELOG?
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@ | |||
process PRESEQ_LCEXTRAP { | |||
tag "$meta.id" | |||
label 'process_single' | |||
label 'error_ignore' | |||
label 'error_retry' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think error_ignore was a good idea actually
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check line 24 - if retrying it uses a different flag. That's the main improvement in this module change. It's been set to ignore for years before this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, gonna update the changelog.
2d21534
to
ce40e8d
Compare
Updating preseq with upstream changes from #382